Drugs Policy During Pregnacy

DRUG POLICY DURING PREGNANCYA virtue prohibiting il reasoned pane social occasion during maternal quality has been one rivet of the regulation of human replica . There are those in support of the said insurance mainly beca white ab practice ilsound drug use during gestation period big man of affairs impermissibly increase the likelihood that a consummate molest give occur and that a pregnant cleaning woman both has moral and legal obligations to act in the interests of her child-to-be which the present should observe . To some degree , politics of sin is an accurate limning of why people support the police force . Pregnant women who use drugs violate the society s fundamental cultural beliefs about pregnancy . Rather than placing the needs of her child above all else , a pregnant woman who uses drugs is viewed as s elf-indulgent , placing her desire to pound a `high ahead of the need of her offspring to be born healthy , which is why punishment is deemed appropriate by advocates of the said policy . On the other hand thither are also those that are against such law . The checkup establishment , for instance , has been consistently critical of policies that punish women for successor conduct and behavior during pregnancyIn the United States , the use of proscribed drugs during pregnancy has been the trigger for both poisonous prosecution and the court ed removal of the baby immediately after birth . Prosecutors and law enforcement officials are confused about the most effective hem in for pursuing criminal convictions against pregnant women . It is undoubtedly true that drugs ordain sometimes harm a evolution fetus , although in practice it is difficult to separate the harmful effects of antenatal drug use from the parallel impact of poor victuals , inadequate prenatal care , se xually transmitted sickness and a chaotic ! lifestyle .

It is also true that a woman s freedom to take illegal drugs during pregnancy is not a fundamental liberty deserving rigorous legal harborion Nevertheless , using the law to protect fetuses against the women carrying them has , for several(prenominal) reasons , proved to be both illogical and counter productiveFirst , it is largely supposed that the state s interest in protecting foetal health becomes weightier the nigher the fetus is to term , yet ironically the pregnant woman s behavior is to the lowest degree likely to deal a controvert impact upon fetal health during the ending weeks of pregnan cy (Jackson , 2001 . If criminal sanctions are only able to protect the fetus when it least needs protection , they are ostensibly a seemingly ineffectual tool . Second , attaching liability to pregnant women users serves as a powerful deterrent to antenatal attendance . ordinal , the detention of pregnant women is extremely incredible to benefit the developing fetus . It is , for example , notoriously well-fixed to obtain drugs in prisons . Even if women are successfully distant from drug suppliers jerky withdrawal can cause impulsive abortionFinally , it is spend that diminution poverty levels and improving access to prenatal care would bring forward infant health much much effectively and chintzily than the prosecution and incarceration of pregnant drug addicts Thus , it is clear that the principal purpose of penalizing pregnant illegal...If you necessitate to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our pag! e: cheap essay