Summary: Types of conflicts

\n\nAttitude to involutions in totalitarian and egalitarian societies is the opposite. At outset they are regarded as ab linguistic rule phenomenon, and the hour as an integral aspect of fundamental interaction between people.\n totalitarian confederacy is characterized by a juicy degree of homogeneousness of the affectionate structure, brotherly order and agreement rigidly centralized state control. standard attribute of much(prenominal)(prenominal) a participation is monoideologiya, with its myths. One of these myths is the absence of conflict in society, on the wholeegedly resulting from the homogeneousness of the social structure, impartiality and equality of all people.\nIn such a society there is no place conflicts, and when they do occur, then regarded as an anomaly, as dysfunction, disrupts the normal rhythm of the mathematical process of the social system. wherefore the method of conflict resolution: to suppress, exterminate power to strike leaders.\nO pposite is link up to conflicts in a republican society, which assumes a variety of forms of life, interwoven multi-level social structure, coexistence many social groups with their declare special interests. domain relations in a elected society governed in the beginning based on the norms of legal, moral, and not by force.\nCoexistence of different social groups and individuals based on the recognition of the specific interests of each other. difference of opinion for their interests naturally leads to clashes, conflicts. thus the first central conclusion: in a democratic society, conflicts are a natural phenomenon.